单场打入两粒头球，孔德是欧冠改制以来巴萨球员第一人（孔德单场双头破门，成为欧冠改制后巴萨第一人）

Considering network details

I think I should ask a clarifying question or let the user know I'm here to help verify with sources, especially if they provide match details. We’re given some general harness config defaults that suggest we assume the network is enabled. However, we don't have a direct web browsing tool, only the shell. I could run a search or a curl command, but there’s uncertainty about the network's state. This could lead to complications.Evaluating network and user request

The CLI might not have network access, but I should ask for approval if needed since the default is "on-failure." I see the user hasn't specifically requested verification; they might just be looking for a catchy response or a discussion. It makes sense to ask them what they want, whether that's verification, context, or significance. I could reply with a question in Chinese about verification. I should also provide some context about scoring two headers in the UCL, while being cautious about stating facts.Structuring the response

I’m thinking about how to structure my reply. I can verify details like match time, opponent, score, and specifics of the goals, along with statistics from media and sources like Opta. It’s smart to ask the user if they have any match info. Alternatively, if they want a catchy social media post, I can create a one-liner. I should keep my question short and in Chinese, asking if they want me to verify data or include more details.